A
study to assess the effectiveness of structured teaching programme
on perceived body image, self efficacy and knowledge on stoma care among
patients with stoma in the selected areas of Christian Medical College (CMC),
Vellore
Mrs.
S. Beulah Angeline
M.Sc.,
(Nursing), Lecturer, Sri Narayani College of
Nursing, Thirumalaikodi, Vellore 632 055
Corresponding Author Email: beulsang83@gmail.com
INTRODUCTION:
Health is a state of optimal functioning or
wellbeing. As defined by the World Health Organization, one’s health includes
physical, social and mental components and is not merely the absence of disease
or infirmity. Health is often a subjective state - a person may be treated, but
still have some psychological problems related to his body (Carol, 2005). The
world health organization lists that the leading cause of illness or death is
due to injuries, cancer, cardiovascular diseases, maternal and nutritional
conditions, infectious and parasitic diseases and HIV/AIDS (WHO, 2004).Cancer
is the leading cause of death globally. WHO estimates that 7.6 million people
died of cancer in 2004 and 84 million people will die in the next 10 years if
action is not taken (Rambo, 1984). Colon and rectal cancers stand third among
the other types of cancers leading to death. There are about 10, 80,000 people
around the world and 78,000 people in South East Asia living with colon and
rectal cancers. Bladder cancer accounts for 5 percentages of all new cases of
cancer among men and 3 percentages of all new cases of cancer among women. Yet
it is the fourth most prevalent cancer in men and sixth most prevalent in women
(WHO, 2008). Despites advancements in medical and surgical interventions for
cancer, stoma surgery is still one of the major treatment for many patients
with colorectal and bladder cancer and radical surgical resection being
considered the only chance for the permanent cure. Because stoma surgery is a
radical procedure the patient not only needs to cope with a major operation but
also faces the loss of important bodily function, distortion of body image and
change in person’s care .The major issue for stoma patients and their
significant others is the management of stoma, physical dexterity, self concept,
and self efficacy (kit man, 2007).
Many clinical studies found patients with ostomies to be a group of people facing multiple adjustment
demands. One of these demands is coping with a significant change in body image and self efficacy. Studies reveal that the
primary needs revolved around personal or social acceptance of altered body
image (Walsh,1995).
Practice is advancing and the future holds
a time of dynamic change and challenge in stoma care nursing. Today’s nurse can
look forward to an opportunity to broaden their ability to advocate for the
needs of patient with stomas by preparing a teaching module so that the overall
health of stoma patients is not compromised.
.
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY:
1. To assess the perceived of body image of
stoma patients before and after the structured teaching programme.
2. To assess the self efficacy of stoma
patients before and after the structured teaching programme.
3. To assess the knowledge of stoma patients
before and after the structured teaching programme.
4. To evaluate the effectiveness of structured
teaching programme on knowledge of stoma care, self
efficacy and perceived body image among stoma patients.
5. To find out the association between
knowledge of stoma care, self efficacy, perceived body
image and selected demographic and clinical variables of stoma patients.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS:
Pre experimental design was used to assess the Perceived body
image and self efficacy, knowledge and the effectiveness of structured teaching
programme on stoma care self efficacy, body image and
knowledge of patients with stoma. The study was conducted in Christian medical
college, Vellore, a multidisciplinary specialty, tertiary medical care centre
with 2334 beds located in Tamil Nadu with all medical facilities to cater to
needs of the patients. A sample size
of 50 men and women with stoma who visited stoma surgery OPD, urology OPD,
stoma clinic and selected surgical wards and those who filled in the inclusion
criteria during the study period were selected through the total enumeration
sampling technique .The tool consisted of demographic, clinical data and also
the modified body image scale (Licavoli, 1998) was
used to assess the body image of patients with stoma. This consists of 17
statements and is a four point likert scale. The
general self efficacy scale (Mathias Jerusalem and Ralf Schwarzer’s,
1981) was used to assess the self efficacy of patients with stoma. The
knowledge questionnaire consists of ten items each consisting of three options
and one correct answer. Demographic and the clinical data were collected from
the patients. Body image scale and the self efficacy scale were given to the
patients for self evaluation. Structured
teaching programme on stoma care self efficacy and
body image was given to the patients, and as a post test assessment the body
image scale and the self efficacy scale was given again to the patient for self
evaluation again after 5 days of teaching.
RESULTS:
Figure1.
Distribution of subjects according to the type of stoma (N=50)
Figure 1 displays that 48% of the subjects with stoma had colostomy. 32%
of them had ileostomy and 20% of them had ileal conduit.
Table 1 shows that the pretest mean as 38.82 and post test mean as 48.58
thereby there is a mean increase in the score of perceived body image by 9.76,
. It shows that the increase in the level of body image was highly significant
(P < 0.001).
Table 2 shows
that the pretest mean as 22.40 and post test mean as 29.52 thereby there is a
significant increase in the score of self efficacy by 7.12. This shows that the
increase in the level of self efficacy was highly significant (P <0.001).
Figure2.
Distribution of subjects with stoma according to their knowledge score in
pretest (N=50)
Table 1:
Effectiveness of structured teaching programme on
perceived body image of subjects with stoma (N=50)
|
PRETEST |
POST TEST |
PAIRED DIFFERENCE |
T VALUE |
P- VALUE |
|||
|
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
||
|
38.82 |
7.08 |
48.58 |
7.99 |
9.76 |
6.26 |
11.01 |
<
0.001** |
Table 2 :Effectiveness of structured teaching programme
on self efficacy in subjects with stoma (N=50)
|
PRETEST |
POST TEST |
PAIRED DIFFERENCE |
T VALUE |
P- VALUE |
|||
|
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
||
|
22.40 |
5.99 |
29.52 |
6.39 |
7.12 |
5.41 |
9.30 |
0.001** |
**P<0.001.
Figure 2 reveals
that 14% of the subjects with stoma had poor knowledge of stoma care.44% had
average knowledge, and 38% of them had good knowledge. Only 2% of them had very
good knowledge in the pretest. Post test reveals that 40% of the subjects had
very good knowledge on stoma care. 58% had good knowledge and 2% had average
knowledge and none exhibited poor knowledge the post test.
Association
between the clinical variables and demographic variables was checked using chi
square, there was no significant association between the perceived body image and socio demographic variables of patients with
stoma namely age, sex, education, occupation, income, marital status, religion,
language, area.
DISCUSSION:
The study
findings revealed that there was statistically significant difference in pre
and post body image, self efficacy and knowledge scores in regard to the
structured teaching programme on stoma care and
therefore the null hypothesis is accepted.
This suggests that patients with stoma have
negative body image, poor self efficacy and average knowledge which needs to be addressed by health care professionals so that
they are lead to good quality life.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
·
Bandura.A. (2006) Self
efficacy mechanism in psychological activation and health promoting behavior. Pp-229-270.
New York raven.
·
Carol.J.B.(2008) Grant
awarded to study self efficacy.
·
Kitman.H.(2007). Self
efficacy and QOL among patients in hongkong. Cancer nursing. 30(3).
·
Rambo. (1984). Stoma care. Journal of wound management. 12(3).
·
WHO. (2004). The global burden of
disease .30.
Received on 03.10.2013 Modified on 22.11.2013
Accepted on 30.12.2013 © A&V Publication all right reserved
Asian J. Nur. Edu. & Research 4(1): Jan.-March 2014; Page 155-157